Working examples

Every example contains:

• Query — the content of the entered message.
• What the advisor does — the skills appearing in the message timeline.
• Response — the structure and type of citations.

The actual content of every response may vary. These are only examples; however, the general shape of the response and the invoked tools generally remain similar.

Example 1 — Votes

Query:

Which Civic Coalition stakeholders voted against the proposed amendment to the energy bill at the last Sejm session? Show the resolution result and link to the vote.

What the advisor does:

1. Legislation — List votings — enumeration of recent votes; filters down to votes concerning the energy bill and the amendment.
2. Legislation — Get voting — retrieval of the per-mandate distribution and metadata.
3. Stakeholders — Get stakeholder — matching names to identifiers for voting Civic Coalition members.

What the response looks like:

The amendment was rejected in Voting 47 of Proceeding 12 on 28 March 2026, with a result of 198 for / 232 against — see [legislation://voting/12/47]. The following Civic Coalition members voted against: [feature://stakeholder/abc-123], [feature://stakeholder/def-456], [feature://stakeholder/ghi-789] (3 out of 134 club members).

Example 2 — Public stance versus voting record

Query:

The Climate Coalition has recently been vocal publicly regarding the coal phase-out. How did its members actually vote in the plenum on coal-related resolutions in the last month? Are there any discrepancies?

What the advisor does:

1. Stakeholders — Search legislators — filtering by Climate Coalition affiliation.
2. Public pulse — Search tweets — searching posts from the last month containing coal phase-out terms.
3. Legislation — List votings — filtering to the same date range.
4. Legislation — Get voting — details of each candidate vote.
5. Legislation — Votes by legislator — cross-verification by club membership.

What the response looks like:

Out of nine plenary votes on coal amendments in the last 30 days, the Coalition was united in six. Three discrepancies:

• Stakeholder Kowalska ([feature://stakeholder/...]) wrote publicly about the proposed transformation fund ([feature://public_pulse/tweet/...]), but voted abstain in the funding amendment ([legislation://voting/12/52]).
• The Coalition split 7–2 on the mine closure schedule amendment ([legislation://voting/12/61]).
• Stakeholder Nowak ([feature://stakeholder/...]) was absent for three of the nine votes.

Example 3 — Document analysis with an attached file

Query:

Summarize the regulatory recommendations in this briefing and check if any of them were passed at recent Sejm sessions (with attached Q1-2026-renewables-briefing.pdf).

What the advisor does:

1. Documents — Read file — reading recommendations directly from the attached file (without a search step — the file identifier is provided).
2. Legislation — List votings — filtering by topics covering each recommendation.
3. Legislation — Get voting — details of matching votes.

What the response looks like:

The briefing contains five recommendations [Q1-2026-renewables-briefing.pdf, c1]. Among them:

• Recommendation 2 (simplification of the connection permit process) corresponds to amendment 14 in the energy bill, passed on 22 March — see [legislation://voting/12/41].
• Recommendation 4 (expansion of the contract for difference limit) was proposed but withdrawn before the vote [Q1-2026-renewables-briefing.pdf, c4].
• The remaining three recommendations have not appeared in proposed legislation so far.

Example 4 — Alert configuration with elicitation

Query:

Configure an alert tracking any reference to the new pharmaceutical reform in plenary speeches and uploaded documents.

What the advisor does:

1. Legislation — List votings — searching for the bill referenced in the question.
2. The match returns two candidate bills — the tool emits an elicitation requesting a selection.
3. (selection from the embedded form)
4. Alerts — Create alert — creating an alert with the specific bill, description, and narrow keywords.

What the response looks like:

Alert Pharmaceuticals Reform 2026 ([feature://alert/...]) has been created. It tracks plenary speeches and uploaded documents. Status: Active, visibility: Private — this can be modified in the alert detail view.

Example 5 — Extracting a document fragment

Query:

Find the fragment in the latest Justice Committee transcript where the chairman announced the schedule for the public procurement bill amendment.

What the advisor does:

1. Documents — Hybrid search — searching committee transcripts for terms related to the procurement bill.
2. Documents — returning a link for the matching fragment.

What the response looks like:

The chairman announced the schedule in the transcript from 30 March 2026 ([documents://chunk/.../...]). Cited fragment:

"The procurement-law amendment will be considered in second reading at the next sitting on 5 April."

The button opens the file scrolled to the cited fragment.

Example 6 — Multi-source legislative briefing

Query:

I need a one-page brief on the state of the renewable energy bill: legislative status, recent committee actions, public party positioning, projected voting outcome, and stakeholder concerns.

What the advisor does:

1. Legislation — List votings, Get voting — the legislative trajectory of the bill.
2. Documents — Hybrid search — committee discussions over the last three weeks.
3. Public pulse — Search tweets — positioning of every major club over the last two weeks.
4. Legislation — Votes by legislator — projecting the vote outcome based on previous alignments.
5. Documents — Hybrid search — internal briefings regarding this bill.
6. Alerts — List alerts — verifying whether an alert covering this bill exists.

What the response looks like:

Status. The bill is in its second reading. The Energy Committee reported positively on 28 March ([legislation://voting/12/38]).

Recent committee actions. The chairman announced 5 April as the voting date ([documents://chunk/.../...]).

Public positioning. The Civic Coalition supports it with reservations ([feature://public_pulse/tweet/...]). PiS opposes it, citing industrial costs ([feature://public_pulse/tweet/...]).

Projected outcome. The bill will likely pass with a margin of 30–45 votes.

No alert covers this bill — an option to create one is available.

Recurring patterns in the examples

Three patterns recur in the examples above:

• The advisor starts with structural searches. Voting records, stakeholder identities, and committees provide an anchor — text searching is narrowed by what the structural tools found.
• Multi-source citations are the norm. Even simple queries produce several URI badges, enabling verification of every claim.
• The advisor gracefully closes its work at turn limits. A broad query ending at the limit returns a full response for the covered portion and a single-line note regarding the deferred scope.